Looking at the original article, it appears that HHS is saying that, for example and in effect, a Roman Catholic hospital can't be required under the law to provide certain classes of contraception. I'm not sure that's an evil thing as long as a woman continues to have a choice about where to seek service.

If you want to argue that a woman will find it substantially more difficult to find the contraception support that she needs if this proposed rule is applied, that would seem to be a different argument than the one that you're making.